I'm upset at all ... Hello, I do not criticize or argue because they are dramatic, much less do it for your preferences, and that does not bother me so effusive in your statements (I find them more palatable, since the arguments that are seasoned with vehemence in bland final result). So in that respect, have no scruples about the way you say things, because that to me does not bother me. No problem I have cooperarte article in the ion of forgiveness (Catholic), but, starting with a general reference to religion, for which, I suggest Reread, including "Old town" of Fustel de Coulanges. There Fustel, explained and demonstrated, which is inherent to human nature, tooth and nail to hold on to security which gives them the certainty that comes in what we believe (even believe, those who believe they do not believe). In antiquity, fetishes and idolatry of dead relatives, providing security and protection.In the homeowner at the time, retained authority to regulate aspects of "religious", from which I derive the right, the social customs and even the early dawn primitive interpretation of the pseudo-science. The worship was unique in every family, hence the wife acquired in law, as the daughter, the husband. This was to confuse the gods, as being "daughter" was a new family and that is why the husband was to take up her new "daughter", and included sacred rites make a pie or cake special "confarriadas marriage." If someone died defending the city, the dead, was not a god for a single family, but it was for all citizens, there arose the census to see who could attend the temple to pray to the god (If a slave was census, it was free, long after joined the "Roman law").Thus, as the family gods defending the family, but detrimental to the strange, the gods of the city defended all registered citizens and foreigners harmed. That is why in case of war, destruction of churches involved the loss of the war. Then, the question evolved into idols materials, which, in the wars were kidnapped or destroyed, leaving the defenseless enemies, since nothing would protect them. The transgressions before these gods had no forgiveness for personal sins, but appeasement and woe to the family or the city that allowed the hijacking or destruction of these gods. The biblical God, no longer a physical entity, then became spiritual, and therefore conveniently - in case of war - could not be destroyed or seized. However, the forgiveness of sins, a sacrifice was fit and at a specific location "The temple of Solomon." That was the first covenant of God with the people of Israel.Then one of the books of the Old Testament predicted that there would come a new covenant, where all humans could pray to that god. The gospel says that the new covenant is that physical sacrifice was abolished, but a spiritual one, and that the sacrifice could take place anywhere in the world and therefore is called Catholic (Universal), which the Israelis consider that that was an aberration. Then the Romans destroyed the last Jewish temple that prevented make sacrifices and to obtain forgiveness, so the prophecy was fulfilled. However, a rabbi felt that without the temple, also could obtain forgiveness in a manner similar to that reported in the Gospels. This is more or less the story of forgiveness Catholic. Best regards - ()
Think Tank (15px By reason or by force) November 22, 2007 16:39 (CET)