What do we make in Spanish Wikipedia is in second place in number of items Something that has struck me powerfully in Spanish is that Wikipedia is in ninth place in many articles, despite having the second highest number of users, then one would expect is second in number of items by the number of users. What we lack strategies to move faster translators Using robots Major transcript of encyclopedia articles that are already in public use Mayor teamwork - For the truth (Talk) 15:30 27 May 2008 (UTC) ((Escalaf n Wikipedia)). Talk to Tomatejc plant 15:41 27 May 2008 (UTC) What are the access speaking cheaper to the Internet . Lin Linao dime 15:42, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Or we could to force those who already have access. Please make at least 100 s per month will be a fine of ten minimum wages: P.Talk to Tomatejc plant 16:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC) facilitate access to the internet not believe it is in our hands. But open access publishing information or to request authorization each other. I have always drawn attention limited clearances we ask: do not reach 150 for over 360,000 items ... I believe that 'people are interested in appearing in WP. - Hermann (Talk) 16:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Sometimes the "logic" is simply a personal assumption. I see the "logic" of the initial claim. Note that being the second highest number of users means only that we have more accounts "inactive" or "unused" that most Wikipedia does not refer at all to the amount of actual participants.- M: Drini 16:22, 27 May 2008 (UTC) How many actual participants are about - Hermann (Talk) 16:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC) So many registered users without much commitment, how pure monkeys . It seems to me that Wikipedia in Spanish there is excess demand, many items are cleared when are miniesbozos recently, I see that in the English Wikipedia is more open about it, users begin to make their first steps with his first articles are quickly desanimados.Por other hand I would like to know how to use translation bots, I think ions in Czech, Netherlands, Japanese, German are more commonly used translations of articles from Wikipedia in other languages, including English .-- For the truth (talk) 16:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC) I guess the solution is in the users. The translators of the robots does not seem a solution, because then we would be sacrificing quality.I think it's preferable to have fewer items of quality to more quality articles where conspicuous by its absence ... Frankly, I see no problem in the post. The important thing is to consolidate Spanish Wikipedia as a reliable and free reference for quality. It has all the time in the world to increase gradually. And for that we all / Aff - Alberto Imedio (talk) 16:48, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Another important factor might be, as sometimes happens muuuchas a conceptual problem: many consider speaking to Wikipedia as a bridge to promote bands, businesses, organizations and emerging professionals. This weakens the patrolmen, and especially the librarians, who eventually are put up, understandably, more tough on sanctions. I say ..Farisori message 17:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Farisori, avalanches of vandalism are in all the wikis (well, there are only small overall vandalism, if not prevented ...) The botopedia (creation articles with bots) was authorized, but no one has yet begun (and I have no idea how it is, I'm not boatman) There are millions and millions of accounts to vandalize other evidence, thousands of puppets, trolls, spammers, blocked by other reasons, withdrawn, some legitimate and some hidden puppet ... I do not think we are 1,355,059 users. We do not know why "bad" because we have "few" articles or that I only know that there is no magic formula for this is resolved, rather than .Hey! Hey! Jarisleif! (Paal Pohja Hakkaa Poika!) 17:27 27 May 2008 (UTC) Pd: and think not only to create articles, we have sketches, and other wikificares to entertain a while I think the translation robots can be very useful, because once made the translation, this is "tuned" and add data from other sources and are faster and articles would take days hacerlos.Me like someone to tell me how to access these robots .-- For the truth (Talk) 17:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Only stubs, categorizing and adding infobox spent a long time. Add to that vandals and others. And our own lives. I can not devote 24 hours to Wikipedia.